Will Wisconsin’s Insurance Laws Work in Favor of Truck Accident Victims?
Will Wisconsin’s Insurance Laws Work in Favor of Truck Accident Victims?
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration oversees the trucking industry and has specific regulations for tractor trailers and commercial carriers regarding insurance coverages. For example, truckers who own authority have the government’s permission to be paid for hauling freight as their own company, and will be issued a motor carrier number. Depending on the type of cargo that is hauled, additional authority and insurance may be required, such as primary liability. If a trucker is leased to a motor carrier, they may need physical damage truck insurance, bobtail coverage, and non-trucking liability. It is best to know the insurance requirements for truckers and the laws governing damage compensation when an accident occurs that results in property damage, physical injury, or death in Wisconsin and a Milwaukee truck accident attorney can guide victims through this process. Truck accident fatalities impact insurance claimsForty-nine thousand one hundred nineteen people died in fatal crashes involving large trucks on U.S. Roadways in 2019 and 67% of those individuals were occupants of other passenger vehicles. Understanding whose insurance will be responsible is an intricate part of a damage award settlement and Wisconsin truck accident attorneys know how to identify all parties who may be responsible for damage compensation after a truck accident. Truck accident lawyers are skilled at identifying additional parties to an accident claim, separate from the truck driver, including trucking companies, mechanics, or manufacturers of a truck and/or parts, and understand the trucking industry and relevant regulatory laws. They can determine the best legal approach to individual cases such as mediation, arbitration or going to trial.
Image by Wannapik Studios.
Pros. The pros in an “at-fault” insurance state are: 1) reckless drivers are held accountable for their actions, and 2) prevention of insurance premiums increasing when drivers are involved in accidents where they are not to blame.
Cons. The cons of an “at-fault” insurance state are: 1) the amount of time spent determining liability after an accident may delay settlement and funding necessary for certain treatments in personal injury and car replacement, and 2) compensation for damages and injuries may be limited if the other driver is under-insured or not insured at all.
About Peter Charles
Having graduated from Saint John’s University in 1993, Peter Charles, Chief Operating Officer, brings a dynamic 28-year sales career reflecting pioneering experience and record-breaking performance in the computer and internet industries. He remains on the industry’s cutting-edge, driving new business through key accounts and establishing strategic partnerships and dealer relationships to increase channel revenue. He is currently focused on providing multiple revenue streams for USAttorneys.com. He can be reached at 800-672-3103.