How Damage Caps in Childhood Sexual Abuse Cases Re-Victimize Victims
How Damage Caps in Childhood Sexual Abuse Cases Re-Victimize Victims
Damage caps in childhood sexual abuse civil lawsuits limit the amount of sexual abuse compensation survivors can receive for their non-economic damages, such as their pain and suffering. These caps often prevent fair compensation, making it harder for survivors to get the support they need to heal. Fair compensation is crucial as it helps cover therapy, medical costs, and other necessities. It also holds perpetrators and negligent institutions accountable, ensuring they face the consequences of their actions. Removing or raising these caps is essential to providing justice and the support survivors need in their recovery journey.Definition and Purpose of Damage Caps Damage caps are legal limits placed on the amount of money that victims can be awarded for their suffering. These caps typically apply to non-economic damages, which include compensation for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life, rather than economic damages like medical bills and lost wages. The intended purposes of damage caps in childhood sexual abuse lawsuits include:
Controlling Insurance Costs: Damage limitations help keep insurance premiums more predictable and affordable for institutions and organizations.
Preventing Excessive Awards: Caps prevent juries from awarding excessively high sums in non-economic damages, which some believe can be unpredictable and potentially unfair.
Encouraging Settlements: Knowing there is a limit on potential awards can encourage both parties to settle out of court, saving time and legal expenses.
Stabilizing Legal System: Caps aim to create more consistency in awards, reducing the variability in compensation for similar cases and promoting a sense of fairness in the legal system.
Protecting Defendants: Especially for smaller organizations or individuals, caps can prevent financial ruin from extraordinarily high damage awards.
Photo by Саша Лазарев from Pexels
Legally, the goal of compensatory damages is to make the victim whole. Damage caps can prevent survivors from receiving fair compensation that covers the full extent of their suffering, medical expenses, and ongoing psychological treatment. This undermines the fundamental legal principle of equitable restitution for harm done.Joanne Doroshow, Executive Director of the Center for Justice & Democracy, emphasizes that damage caps disproportionately impact the most severely injured plaintiffs, who need the highest compensation for their lifelong needs. This results in unjust outcomes that fail to address the true extent of the harm suffered. She argues that caps mainly harm women, children, and seniors, who often rely more heavily on non-economic damages for compensation. Such caps ultimately benefit insurance companies at the expense of those who have suffered significant losses.Advocacy and Legal ReformsAdvocacy efforts in the US aimed at eliminating or raising damage caps to support survivors of childhood sexual abuse are actively pursued by various organizations and lawmakers. Several states have seen proposed legislation aimed at either eliminating or significantly raising damage caps for survivors of childhood sexual abuse. For example, in June 2024, the Massachusetts Judiciary Committee reviewed House Bill 1446, which aims to lift a $20,000 "charitable immunity" limit in child sexual and physical abuse cases against nonprofits. Additionally, organizations such as Child USA, Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), and the National Center for Victims of Crime actively lobby for legislative changes at both the state and federal levels. They work to raise awareness about the impact of damage caps on survivors and advocate for reforms that prioritize survivor rights and sexual abuse compensation.Advocacy groups often form coalitions with legal experts, lawmakers, and other stakeholders to strengthen their advocacy efforts. These coalitions work towards impactful legislative changes and policy reforms by pooling resources and expertise.Several states have taken steps to reform or eliminate damage caps specifically related to childhood sexual abuse cases, recognizing the unique and severe nature of these offenses. They include:
New York: The Child Victims Act, passed in 2019, allowed survivors of childhood sexual abuse to file lawsuits against their abusers and institutions without restrictive damage caps, providing a one-year look-back window for older cases.
New Jersey: New Jersey enacted legislation in 2019 that extended the statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse cases and included a two-year window for survivors to file lawsuits without damage caps.
Hawaii: Hawaii revised its laws in 2012 to extend the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits related to childhood sexual abuse, allowing survivors more time to seek legal recourse without damage caps restricting compensation.
Minnesota: Minnesota removed damage caps for childhood sexual abuse cases in 2013, allowing survivors to seek compensation for damages without arbitrary limits.
Department of Justice (DOJ) – Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) https://www.justice.gov/ovw
National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) https://www.nctsn.org
RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network) https://www.rainn.org National Sexual Assault Hotline
State and Local Bar Associations